On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 19:04 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:47:26AM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > As a random data point, I tried a single flow from my main server in .no > > to my backup server in .nl and compared CUBIC (with sch_fq) to BBR > > (naturally > > also in sch_fq) on the sender side. The results were quite consistent across > > runs: > > Another datapoint: A friend of mine had a different, worse path (of about 40 > ms) > and tested with iperf. > > CUBIC delivered 20.1 Mbit/sec (highly varying). BBR delivered 485 Mbit/sec.
Yes ;) I had cases where cubic was delivering 3 Mbits, but BBR could deliver 1000 times more ;) Thanks ! _______________________________________________ Bloat mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
