On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Andrew Dalke <[email protected]> wrote: > On Feb 19, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote: >> Freedom to redistribute and modify is used in Open Source to make that >> a non-issue. (just saying ... I think people understand where I'm >> getting at :) > > You removed the start of my comment:
I trying to support your question, not argument against it... I have not seen in any definition of Open Standard that the 'standard definition organization' is required to commit themselves and support it for X years. > Wanted to also point out that "open group" here isn't that well defined. > > That is, if "open specification" requires an "open group" then what defines > an open group, and does that group have to exist in perpetuity? Indeed. This is rather unclear to me too, as I tried to further get into in my last reply to Peter. I don't know what a 'community process' is... Egon -- Post-doc @ Uppsala University Proteochemometrics / Bioclipse Group of Prof. Jarl Wikberg Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
