Sorry, I've overlooked nuclear spin data, it's already present in isotopes.xml :)
But it's representation (values like "1/2+") is not good for parsing. Maybe it's worth to convert them into conventional floating-point numbers? Also, elements.xml lacks information about most abundant isotope, so it's seems like I need to parse all of them and compare relativeAbundance values to get nuclear spin for the most abundant isotope. Is there any workaround? 17.06.10, 12:43, "Egon Willighagen" <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:35 AM, Egon Willighagen > wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Daniel Leidert > > wrote: > >> Further please note, that only one CCO (at least I > >> guess you mean the Creative Commons license series) license qualifies > >> for Debian main and I would like to leave bodr in the main section of > >> Debian without stripping stuff. > > > > No. CC Zero (CC0) is not in the CC license series you refer to. It is > > also not mentioned on that Debian page. > > See: > > > http://lists.debian.org/cgi-bin/search?query=cc0&DEFAULTOP=and&author=&sort=relevance&HITSPERPAGE=10&language=en > > It seems all agree that CC0 is DFSG compatible, though some complain a > bit about the length formulation. > > You also might want to read this bug report, where CC0 is stated as > DSFG-compatible: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=572648#4 > > Which is about the unifdef package in main. > > I hope this addresses your worries... > > Egon > > -- Regards, Konstantin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Blueobelisk-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/blueobelisk-discuss
