http://topfunky.com/baseline-rhythm-calculator/ I`m going to test
14/21 for the sheer hell of it.

ss

On Sep 5, 5:40 am, "Christian Montoya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Subsorama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 4 Sep 2008, at 21:34, Christian Montoya wrote:
>
> >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Subsorama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> On 4 Sep 2008, at 17:58, Christian Montoya wrote:
>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 11:03 AM, spills <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> I am sure this has been approached before but, the default 18px
> >>>>> baseline height is a horrible multiplier. Why not add 2 lousy
> >>>>> pixels
> >>>>> to make it 20px high? In layouts where I have added the 2px
> >>>>> addition,
> >>>>> they seem to work just fine and in Mac world look better in IMO.
> >>>>> There
> >>>>> is an added benefit of making it easier for clients to maintain
> >>>>> layout
> >>>>> baseline consistency as they can do math better with 20px rule more
> >>>>> so
> >>>>> than the 18px rule especially on really long layouts.
>
> >>>>> Just my 2 cents.
>
> >>>>> Thanks
>
> >>>> Your 2 cents are understood, but the reason for the choice is to
> >>>> follow the typographic convention of 1.5, where the height of the
> >>>> line
> >>>> is 1.5 times the height of the text. You could change the line
> >>>> height
> >>>> to 20 px in your custom stylesheet, but then you wouldn't be able to
> >>>> impress the typography nerds with your attention to their
> >>>> conventions.
>
> >>> There is no such convention, if that advice has been proffered to you
> >>> as a guide it is overly simplistic to the point of simply being bad
> >>> advice.
>
> >> Let's just step back for a moment. I wrote some of typography.css, and
> >> when I did, I followed the conventions discussed on this page:
>
> >>http://webtypography.net/Rhythm_and_Proportion/Vertical_Motion/2.2.2/
>
> >> One important thing to understand is that while 12 px text height & 20
> >> px line height might make it easier to do calculations for page
> >> designers, Blueprint is not offered as an "out-of-the-box" solution to
> >> page designers. It is offered as an out-of-the-box solution to people
> >> who know the very least about design, so as to help them make
> >> something attractive even if they don't know how.* For page designers,
> >> they know how to mess with their vertical rhythm, and are free to
> >> change it as they please.
>
> >> * This is my view, not the view of the entire core team.
>
> > Okay, the fault might lies with Richard Rutter and his examples. His
> > sidenotes example differs from the book in that it states line heights
> > must match - whereas in the book the actual sidenotes are set much
> > tighter - and you can probably find examples of this everywhere.
> > Actually I see this is fixed in fancy type. He is still only providing
> > an example though and not single set formula which might be mistaken
> > for a convention.
>
> OK, I understand that it's not a convention, but you have to admit
> that 1.5 works really nicely as a convention because the line-height
> always comes out to a whole value when the font-size is an even
> number. So if you wanted to change the text size to a base of 14, your
> line-height would be 21, and if you wanted it to be 16, your
> line-height would be 24. If you have 12/20, or 1.667, then if you
> change your font-size to 14, your line height ends up being a decimal,
> which may or may not be rounded correctly. It would only come out to a
> whole value for font-sizes that are multiples of 3, which gives you
> less options.
>
> Just an idea... my point is that 12/18 doesn't make hand calculations
> easier but the fact that it's 1.5 makes the whole thing more flexible.
>
> --
> --
> Christian Montoya
> christianmontoya.net- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Blueprint CSS" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to