I like that the container size is part of the framework and there may be some additional features I'm not aware that are different than blueprint. I would defintely focus on fluid since this ismuch more useful for mobile devices. I think BP has momentum you shouldnt forget about and jump into another framework just because it's a competitor, but don't be afraid to look forward to beat the pants off them (using their pants).
Thatcher On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Christian Montoya <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello all, > > If you didn't know, Blueprint was recently featured here: > > http://www.noupe.com/css/5-popular-css-frameworks-tutorials-tools-for-getting-started.html > > And the article hit the homepage of Digg.com less than 6 hours ago. > And the best part? The article actually links to blueprintcss.org!!! > > In other news, I'm going to be looking at 960gs & the fluid version > over the next couple weeks. I've heard very good things about it and > I'm curious to see how robust the fluid version is. It's very likely > that I'm going to make a "lite" version of Blueprint that does not > include the grid.css, so that people can very easily use it with a > layout framework like 960gs, or with a compressed grid stylesheet like > what Construct offers. My question to you all is, have you used 960gs? > Do you like it? Does it have any strengths over the Blueprint's grid > stylesheet? Please share. > > -- > -- > Christian Montoya > mappdev.com :: christianmontoya.net > > > > -- Christopher Thatcher --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Blueprint CSS" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/blueprintcss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
