[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-44?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13526341#comment-13526341
]
Gagan Deep Juneja commented on BLUR-44:
---------------------------------------
I completely understood your point here. let me reiterate my understanding in
low level coding details.
1) User is creating BlurAnalyzer object by passing thrift analyzer.
2) We need to create all details about AnalyerTypes and AnalyzerSubTypes in
BlurAnalyze Object.
3) When user is passing any field to my getAnalyzer method I am going to return
Analyzer. Here user will be passing IndexFields or can also pass SubFields.
What I want to ask here is do we need to keep all the analyzers(default +
subtypes) in one Map with their respective fields(names or subnames) or do we
need to create two different data structures.
4) We can also provide list of the subNames for a Index name.
5) We are going to keep only Index names in Lucene Store not the subNames.
> Update BlurAnalyzer to use the Blur Thrift Analyzer object.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BLUR-44
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-44
> Project: Apache Blur
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.2.0
> Environment: 0.2-dev-removing-old-thrift branch
> Reporter: Aaron McCurry
> Fix For: 0.2.0
>
>
> The BlurAnalyzer constructor that takes a
> org.apache.blur.thrift.generated.Analyzer currently does nothing. Obviously
> this needs to be implemented, I have added javadocs to the Blur thrift API
> that describes the expected behavior.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
