[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-44?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13527861#comment-13527861
]
Gagan Deep Juneja commented on BLUR-44:
---------------------------------------
Yes. I completely agree.
1) Can we have IndexableFieldFactory for AnayzerSubType? example Main
classDefinition is some Analyzer but we might have IndexableFieldFactory for
some subtype. or viceversa like IndexableFieldFactory for main classDefinition
and Analyzer for subtypes.
2) What is the use of map<string,binary> arguments in ClassDefinition class. Do
we need to take care of this field as well?
3) How FieldManager class will look like? Should we pass same Thrift Analyzer
to this class as well and create Map of IndexableFieldFactories and return the
IndexableFieldFactory for some fieldName passed.
4) Should we move toLucene method to FieldManager class.
5) Who will call FieldManager and BlurAnalyzer class. Because client need to
make sure that they will call both in conjunction.
Thanks
> Update BlurAnalyzer to use the Blur Thrift Analyzer object.
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BLUR-44
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BLUR-44
> Project: Apache Blur
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.2.0
> Environment: 0.2-dev-removing-old-thrift branch
> Reporter: Aaron McCurry
> Fix For: 0.2.0
>
> Attachments: BlurAnalyzer.java
>
>
> The BlurAnalyzer constructor that takes a
> org.apache.blur.thrift.generated.Analyzer currently does nothing. Obviously
> this needs to be implemented, I have added javadocs to the Blur thrift API
> that describes the expected behavior.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
