[uucdigest]          Monday, January 31 2000          Volume 03 : Number 160



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| For all available Digest commands including unsubscribe/subscribe,
| visit the BMW UUC Digest page: http://www.uucdigest.com
| Send SUBMISSIONS to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Complaints?  Send 'em to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you must.
| Visit http://www.bubbaclub.com
| www.bimmers.com - "serving enthusiasts on the 'net"
| Visit http://www.bimmer.org - ultimate BMW bulletin boards!
| Subscribe to the Zionsville Autosport Parts Digest:
|   http://www.zionsvilleautosport.com/majordomo.htm
�����������������������������������������
In this BMW UUC Digest:

       [uuc] Dribbly nozzles...
       RE: V10 vs V12 in F1 was Re: [uuc] <OT> F1 engine question
       Re: [uuc] bought the F650
       [uuc] A Wish
       Re: [uuc] Jim and his stories
       [uuc] Re: Changing V-belt on M5
       [uuc] Kart endurance race for RMC chapter members
       [uuc] The Dribbles
       [uuc] Jim and the Compressor Story
       [uuc] <OT> Viper alarms - better transmitter casings?
       [uuc] CCA Elections for VP

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:54:16 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [uuc] Dribbly nozzles...

Yup, had it on my 88 325i.  There's a t-fitting under the hood that
splits fluid from the single line from your washer fluid pump to the 2
nozzles.  The fitting is actually a 1-way valve on the nozzle side and
one of the valves has failed.  Pry the hood insulation retainers off (use
2 small screw drivers; just remove the half closest to the nozzles) and
remove the t-fitting.  Have 3 small hose clamps ready (you DON'T want to
reuse the ones BMW gave you!!) and an assortment of plain t-fittings (I
think it was 1/4", but can't remember).  My washer works great.

88 325i
CCA98984
Dan Runyon

________________________________________________________________
YOU'RE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR THE INTERNET!
Juno now offers FREE Internet Access!
Try it today - there's no risk!  For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/tagj.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:06:18 -0700
From: "Desoto, Byron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: V10 vs V12 in F1 was Re: [uuc] <OT> F1 engine question

Hi Adam--

Unfortunately, the FIA has recently ruled out any engine larger than
10-cylinders until 2007.  A rather displeasing move, in my opinion.

Ciao,
Byron

- -----Original Message-----
From: Adam Fila [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 5:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: V10 vs V12 in F1 was Re: [uuc] <OT> F1 engine question


V12's are allowed in F1.  The www.tifosi-club.com web
page has a good writeup in the tech section on the Ferrari
V12 at http://www.tifosi-club.com/tech/v12.htm and
http://www.tifosi-club.com/tech/v12b.htm

>From the article:

"One of the main problems with the 3.0-liter V12, was lack
of drivability. This was a direct result of torque loss. Also
hindering performance was the higher weight in comparison
to its ten cylinder counterparts.  While horsepower and
RPMs were near to equal with those of the competitors,
overall drive out of the corners was not.

The new generation of V12 engines will not be subject to the
same limitations as its predecessors. There are several
factors that favor this layout. The modern ten-cylinder motor
creates incredible amounts of vibration. This in turn requires
strengthening almost every part of the car behind the cockpit.
This adds up to extra weight. While the V12 engine weighs
more than a V10, it runs smooth, not having the same quantity
of destructive oscillations and harmonics. This allows for lighter
parts, both in construction of the engine and the surrounding
components. Engine parts that weigh less can rotate faster.
Thus, higher RPMs can be achieved, generating more
horsepower. Another contributor to horsepower is the increase
in combustion efficiency due to the smaller cylinder size.

There are, as with anything, drawbacks. The addition of two
cylinders brings added friction. There is an increased surface
area on the cylinder walls, bearings, crankshaft, and camshafts.
Eight more valves need to be actuated. The physical
dimensions of the engine increase. Torque loss must be
rectified to improve drivability issues. Resolving these
concerns is no small task."

Btw, this is what the FIA F1 rulebook says about the engine:
(from http://www.fia.com/)

ARTICLE 5 : ENGINE
5.1 Engine specification :
5.1.1 Only 4-stroke engines with reciprocating pistons are
permitted.
5.1.2 Engine capacity must not exceed 3000 cc.
5.1.3 Supercharging is forbidden.
5.1.4 The maximum number of cylinders is 12 and the normal
section of each cylinder must be circular.
5.1.5 Engines may have no more than 5 valves per cylinder.

OBMWC #1: Sorry for all this Ferrari talk, but I believe it does
apply to BMW as well, and probably explains their choice of a
V10 over a V12.  (BMW, much like Ferrari, would get a bigger
marketing benefit from winning in F1 with a traditional V12,
rather than a V10, which neither manufacturer sells in their
production cars - same reasons for "V12" in the LMR's name
- - marketing)

OBMWC #2:  One of the last drivers of the last Ferrari V12 F1
engine ('95 season) was Gerhard Berger, who is now the
director of BMW Motorsport and the head of BMW's F1
program.

- -Adam Fila
'95 M3 (which wouldn't object to a V12 engine transplant :)

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Desoto, Byron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 7:07 PM
Subject: RE: [uuc] <OT> F1 engine question


> Hi all--
>
> Actually, the current figures are (and these are conservative, as this is
> only what the manufacturers with "quote" in PR kits):
>
> Ferrari 049 V10: 17500 rpm
> Mercedes FH110H V10: 17800 rpm
> Honda (Mugen) MH301 V10: 18200 rpm
>
> No idea what the Ford/Jaguar Evolution 4 V10 is doing...
>
> If the FIA allowed V12's back in, no doubt we'd be seeing 20,000+ rpm
power
> plants.  :)
>
> Ciao,
> Byron
>
> '00 M Coupe

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 18:14:19 -0800
From: Jim Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [uuc] bought the F650

Gaaaackkkkk!  There's nothing wrong with those bikes.  They are really
nice.  They just don't feel right to my butt dyno.  

And there aren't that many used BMWs available.  Not here anyway.  If
people are getting rid of them, its through the good 'ol boy network.  I
never see them.  So, since I wanted to buy new, the F650 is what I had
to choose from.  Besides, I will reiterate, I wanted a narrow, nimble 
bike to weave through traffic on.  Riding between lanes of traffic is
legal in California.  The boxer may be narrow enough to do that but it
*feels* wider to me.

I really never expected to take heat for actually *buying* a BMW. :) 
But I'll conform if I must, just send me a check for $7300 and I'll drop
this abortion off at the crusher tommorrow and go get a REAL BMW.


Jim Powell
Fake BMW '99 F650
Fake BMW '98 M3 <== not enough throttle bodies for some, rectangular
tailights etc.
Fake BMW '90 325i  <== It only has 2 valves per cylinder and a slushbox

Maybe I should just uns*bscribe, resign from the club and go buy a
Taurus and Goldwing



Phil Marx wrote:
> 
> Jim Powell wrote:
> >I've driven lots of air cooled BMWs, just to take a ride on friends
> >bikes.  I'll be frank.......I don't like heavy bikes and to me the BMW was
> >the Cadillac of motorcycles.  They had their purposes and none of them
> >were for me.
> >
> >Thats not to say I don't like them.  I just don't do that type of riding.
> 
> I've met Jim and he's a nice guy and an intelligent fellow. And I know we
> all become defensive of our prized machines, especially when we've just
> gotten them.  That being said, I still don't understand the point of
> favoring the F650 over the "real", classic, air-cooled boxer model --for
> the rest of you who may be interested.  Jim says he's ridden them and he
> doesn't like heavy bikes and doesn't do "that kind of riding".  Allow me to
> defend my suggestion to him against his desires/complaints with some facts.
> 
> Dry weight lbs: F650  '95 R100R    '95 R100GS   '81 R100CS    '72 R60/6
> (NADA)          421     434             434         437           421
> 
> Horsepower       48      60              60          70            46
> 
> rear drive      chain   shaft           shaft      shaft        shaft
> 
> frnt.brake     1 disc   2 disc         2 disc      2 disc       alloy drum
> 
> And for the rest of you who seem to be laboring under the wrong impression
> that BMW motorcycles are heavy slugs ridden by paunchy middle aged men
> (well you may be right about that but I wasn't paunchy or old when I
> started 29 years ago):
> 
> Consider the new R1100S:487lbs.,98hp,6sp,ABS,twin front discs. (No Cadillac)
> 
> I know Jim will love the F650, but that's no reason others of you should
> have to perpetuate the erroneous impression of BMW bikes handed out by
> others.
> 
> Just performing my evangelical duties.
> 
> -Phil Marx
>  R27, R69US, R60/5, R100CS

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:51:09 -0500
From: Jacob Steijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] A Wish

More humor


http://home.att.net/~viseguy/fun.html

It's a beautiful day, let's play two!  
                            -- Ernie Banks

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:46:27 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [uuc] Jim and his stories

Powell wrote:
>I'll wait a few days and retell it.

>Jim

OK but you also have to tell us the UPS and the dozen ******* story.
The one about the blue bulbs and the girl had me on the floor.
My co-workers think there is something definitely wrong with me laughing so
hard
at the computer.

Carlos
91 M3

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:07:11 -0500
From: Jacob Steijn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] Re: Changing V-belt on M5

This is the method I used.  It works.  I managed to get the belt wedged on
pretty well but not all the way around the pulley, then got in the car and
turned it over.  I thought that was safer than having someone else tweak
the starter with me under the car.  It might take a few tries to get the
belt to "catch" but it seems to be about the only way.

I tried the longer belt method, but the next size available is really too
long, it makes you run the adjuster out to its limit and still there's
insufficient tension.

Fred said:
>
>I don't know if the M5 is different from a regular E28 but this trick worked 
>for me.
>Get the belt on as much as you can and have someone give the key a quick
turn 
>to activate the starter briefly. If you have it on in the right direction it 
>will engage fully.
>Need I say BE VERY CAREFUL!
>Fred Callender RMC
>

Jake - 88 M5, not completely stock
It's a beautiful day, let's play two!  
                            -- Ernie Banks

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:22:27 -0800 (PST)
From: Andy Peavy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] Kart endurance race for RMC chapter members

I am organizing a 200 lap kart endurance race for Rocky Mountain
Chapter members.  The race is on Saturday, Feb. 26.  The track is at
I-70 and Colorado Blvd.

We will have random teams of four.  Each person will do two shifts of
25 laps.  Guaranteed to be a blast!


Keep an eye out for the Motorsport Report.  It will have details on how
to register for the event.  The event space is limited, so make sure
and register promptly.

Andy Peavy
91 535i
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 22:32:00 -0500
From: "Duane Collie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] The Dribbles

>Dribily fluid

>I have had this happen quite a few times recently. I have a feeling it
>has to do with the outside temperature. When it is warmer it works fine,
hits the target perfect with full force.
>Seems that when it is colder the passenger side does fine but the driver
side
>diminishes. The owners manual says the nozzles are heated. But it makes
>me wonder if the freeze up is occurring closer to the T pipe? I'm
>thinking of trying some various additives. Anyone have any ideas?

You guys want me to run with this one?  <ROTFLMAO>  Nawwwww........<still
chuckling>........I could be SO bad with this.....especially the 'freeze up
close to the T pipe".

Oh baby.

Oh.

- - Duane Collie <TRYING to be good.  But still amused.
The Seven Sled

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 19:55:33 -0800
From: Jim Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] Jim and the Compressor Story

Ok, so Rob loves the compressor story.

I've never used my air compressor very much for filling tires and such. 
Its such a pain dragging the air hose around.  For a long time I've used
the portable airtank I bought at Walmart for track use.  That little
airtank has always worried me.  After all, I only paid like $13 for the
thing.  When you look at the fittings, the airhose, the box, the
instructions, the shipping and profit to the manufacturer and Walmart...

JUST HOW GOOD COULD THE STEEL AND WELDING BE, ANYWAY?

Every time I fill that little POS tank up at the compressor, I have
these visions of the thing exploding or blowing the fitting out of the
tank and through my head.  My whole family knows I have this phobia. 
Don't tell me you don't all think about this.  Ok, maybe its just me. 
Well one day I'm down to about 40 lbs after filling bike tires so I fire
up the compressor and start refilling the tank.  I have a small hotdog
compressor that takes forever to fill the tank to 125 psi.  While
waiting and waiting for the tank to fill, I start thinking about that
tank exploding.  Deep in apprehensive thought, I miss my 14 year old son
sneaking up behind me.  POW!!!!  He pops a puffed up lunch bag behind my
head.  There are airhoses flying, tanks rolling around, excrement
coating every surface in the garage and this son of mine, the fruit of
my loins, is laughing like a hyena and I'm chasing him all over the
neighborhood.  The little booger is on the cross country team so my
chances of catching him are nil.

Someday I'll get even.  I swear.

Jim

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 23:50:58 -0500
From: Ken W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] <OT> Viper alarms - better transmitter casings?

I have a Viper 300+ alarm in my M3, and tobe honest, because of the
transmitter alone, I would have gotten an Alpine.  I absolutely hate
the Viper's remote.  The stupid buttons get hit so easily that I will
arm/disarm often just putting it back into my pocket, or sometimes not
even that.  I NEVER had these problems with the BMW/Alpine I had on my
'97 318ti.  Anyone know if a different casing at least I could get for
the 2-button Viper remote?

Thanks for any suggestions.  You would be helping me retain my
saninty, if there is any left to begin with... :)



- -Ken 
'91 M3
'86 GTI

- -- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]            AIM: ScopusFest

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 23:51:44 -0500
From: "Duane Collie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] CCA Elections for VP

Yo !

Yeah you !

Did you get out your CCA ballot from the Roundel and VOTE your preference
yet for Vice President of our esteemed organization?  I've seen very little
discussion on the topic, and it does matter who you elect.  While it's
probably not a real good thing to stand up and declare support for a
particular candidate in this forum, the important thing is to VOTE.  And ask
questions!  Hell, three of the candidates are here on this list....don't
ya'll have any questions for them at all?

Other than, "Why is my Roundel always late?"

For example:

I would like to know if any of our VP Candidates would support a national
standard of qualifications to be a Driving School Instructor, and a database
of all qualified instructors to be made available to the various chapter
driving school coordinators?  Right now, every Chapter pretty much does it's
own thing internally , and there is no standardized qualification program
that I know of.  So when Chapter "A" needs some Instructors, they would be
able to contact all Instructors through the database within a given
Region.....etc....and pull some Instructors from Chapter "B". And that way
as well,
a BMWCCA Instructor, once qualified, would be able to teach at all Chapters.
Candidates?

Another Q for the Candidates:  Would any of you support and petition for a
Autocross Starting and Training Program for the Chapters?  Some Chapters,
like National Capital and Windy City, are extremely active in autocross.
Other Chapters don't have a clue how to get started. Why not some National
CCA Funding on a 50/50 basis for purchasing of timing equipment, cones, etc.
to help the other CCA Chapters get started on autocross, and arrange to have
experienced pros from NCC and Windy City and the like to help train those
Chapters wanting to get started?  Autocross is the most fun you can have
with
a street car without beating it up like a day at the track.  Would any of
the candidates
support this?

I think the UUCDIGEST can be put to better use than bashing cops like we
have been for the past 10 issues.  C'mon gang....do ya care who the guys n'
gals are that are steering the Club?

- -Duane Collie
The Seven Sled

------------------------------

End of [uucdigest] V3 #160
**************************

_________________________________________
| Please visit these UUC-approved BMW parts vendors/service providers:
| (listed alphabetically)
| Bonneville Motorwerks . http://www.bonnevillemotorwerks.com
| Circle Tire Co. (used & classic BMW parts) e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Curry's Auto Service .  http://www.currysauto.com
| Eurosport . http://www.eurosport-hp.com
| Koala MotorSport . http://www.koalamotorsport.com
| Taylor BMW - http://www.taylorbmw.com - Doc Bimmer!
| The Ultimate Garage . http://www.ultimategarage.com
| UUC Motorwerks . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
| Zionsville Autosport . http://www.zionsvilleautosport.com
����������������������������������������

Reply via email to