[uucdigest]        Wednesday, August 20 2003        Volume 03 : Number 6678



_________________________________________________________________
|
|  Search the ARCHIVES:
|     http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|  Visit Richard Nott's Ultimate BMW Database:
|     http://www.bmwdatabase.com
|
| For all available Digest commands including unsubscribe/subscribe,
| visit the BMW UUC Digest page: http://www.uucdigest.com
|
| Send SUBMISSIONS to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Complaints?  Send 'em to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you must.
| Technical Problems? Send 'em to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|__________________________________________________________________

In this BMW UUC Digest:

       Re: [uuc] more I-6s
       [uuc] Straight sixes - move over BMW!
       [uuc] Fw: E30 Brake Switch
       RE: [uuc] Spam-er, marketing e-mail from BMW NA
       RE: [uuc] M3 is 99% ordinary?
       RE: [uuc] Spam-er, marketing e-mail from BMW NA
       RE: [uuc] Fw: E30 Brake Switch
       RE: [uuc] Book repair charges - WAS Central Locking Question

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 04:31:59 -0500
From: "Ben White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [uuc] more I-6s

<snip> Dennis Liu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
<snip, again>, as far as I
> can dimly
> recall, BMW
> > is the ONLY maker currently selling in-line six
> engines (correct?
> everyone
> > else has moved to a Vee configuration, right?)>
____________
Dennis,
   There are still a few I-6s on the market.  GM has a fairly new I-6 in
some of it's small suvs and perhaps pickups, Toyota/Lexus, and perhaps even
Jeep still offers one.
             Best,
                Ben White/Ocean Springs, MS

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:31:11 +0100
From: "Andrew Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] Straight sixes - move over BMW!

Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

"What got me curious is not so much that, as far as I can dimly recall, BMW
is the ONLY maker currently selling in-line six engines (correct?  everyone
else has moved to a Vee configuration, right?), but rather that BMW mentions
that its legendary inline six-cylinder engine is available in 2.5 and
3.0-liter displacements -- and totally neglects to include the M3's 3246cc
motor.  I presume it's because M3s are still selling (relatively) well, and
the 330 and 325 need a bit of promotion?"

Aside from the others mentioned in this thread, TVR sells straight sixes in
its
road cars.

They come in various forms.  Probably worth mentioning:

350 bhp/290 lb-ft 3.6 straight 6
390 bhp/310 lb-ft 3.6 straight 6
400 bhp/320 lb-ft 4.0 straight 6
440 bhp/350 lb-ft 4.2 straight 6

All naturally aspirated (That's 105 bhp per litre, AND 83 lb-ft per litre,
for the top engine.) The performance, given typical TVR kerb weight
(1100 kg), is shattering.  Emissions are competitive, fuel economy is not.

Also BMW NA in its press release forgot to mention the 320i, which it sells
in Canada and plainly forgot about.  The smallest six (2.0 or 2.2 litres)
has always been regarded as the smoothest of them all.

Andy T

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 08:35:36 -0400
From: "Stan Jackson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] Fw: E30 Brake Switch

I received no reponses, so I'll try this again.  Is it typical for these
things to act up a bit before failing completely?

Stan


- ----- Original Message -----
From: Stan Jackson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:27 AM
Subject: E30 Brake Switch


> I recently had my brake switch act up.  This is the switch located on the
> brake pedal.  My brake lights quit, so I tried to check that switch.  I
> never got it removed, but just by playing with it the lights started
working
> again.  Should I be changing the switch (imminent failure?) or was it more
> likely just a bit loose/bad connection?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stan
>
>

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:07:05 -0400
From: "Andrew E. Skopp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [uuc] Spam-er, marketing e-mail from BMW NA

In its attempt to copy the 3 series, Lexus builds its IS300 with an inline 6.

Andrew E. Skopp


Dennis Liu at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> What got me curious is not so much that, as far as I can dimly recall, BMW
> is the ONLY maker currently selling in-line six engines (correct?  everyone
> else has moved to a Vee configuration, right?)

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:12:38 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [uuc] M3 is 99% ordinary?

Lee wrote:
>I think you may have slightly missed the point of the e-mail.  Yes, the
E30
>M3 is very different from the non-motorsports cars (more so than the other
>M3's), but brakes are brakes.  The suspension is suspension & although it
is
>different, there's nothing rocket science about it--the torque specs are
>even the same.

I agree 100% here.

>I do disagree with Neil about the S14.  I bet there's probably a handful
of
>experts nationwide as they are much more sofisticated than most BMW
engines.
>How many guys can really do a proper valve adjustment, base CO adjustment,
>base idle adjustment & TB synch?

I'll disagree with this part.  Lee you might be surprised as to the number
of
people out there that do their own work, including everything listed above.
The valve
adjustment can be done with parts from Pep Boys for crying out loud, you
think we
really need Snap-On NASA calibrated feeler guages to shove under an ///M
special
production bucket shim?  Everything is quite simple about these cars but
things
get blown out of proportion on email lists.  Yes you need a couple of
special tools
but that's it everything else you can tear down and rebuild with your
Crapsman tools. :-)
You don't need so called "experts", all you need is a decent set of tools,
a half
way decent manual and perhaps a person you can call when you're ready to
punt and
that's it.  You can service these cars completely by yourself.

Heck I'll say the cars are 100% ordinary, forget about 99. ;-)

Carlos
91 M3  hasn't seen a mechanic in 4 years and it hasn't blowed up yet
88 iS  Vanilla flava

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:25:46 -0400
From: "Dennis Liu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [uuc] Spam-er, marketing e-mail from BMW NA

Mea culpa!  I was totally wrong in the first psrt of my statement.  I
totally forgot about the Lexus IS300, and the GM/Jeep SUV engines (since I
was referring to the US market, I'm not including the Australian and British
engines.  :-)  I was thinking about MB and Jaguar dropping their I-6s,
sacrificing the inherent smoothness of the inline design for the packaging
efficiency of the Vee design.

Thanks for all of the responses.  But no one addressed the main thrust of my
post (Andrew did point out that Canada has the 320i), which was that BMW is
promoting its "legendary" inline-6 motors but totally left out the larger
displacement one in the M3....

vty,

- --Dennis

- -----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rob Levinson
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [uuc] Spam-er, marketing e-mail from BMW NA


Other currently-available I6 engines:

Toyota/Lexus (IS300)
Jeep (all models with 6-cylinder option)
Ford (Truck engines and Australian Falcon -
http://www.newfalcon.com.au/ )
GM (Vortec I6 truck engine -
http://media.gm.com/news/releases/g000823c.html)
Dodge (Diesel truck)

Otherwise, yes... the other stalwart I6 car engines long admired such
as the Mercedes and Jaguar are indeed history.  I doubt many people
miss the I6 car engines in older domestics.

At least we still have the "right' pancake (boxer) sixes around -
Porsche, Subaru, and Honda (Goldwing).  Rumors of a new BMW boxer 6
in a bike have been floating around for almost 20 years, and that
ought to be interesting if it ever materializes.

- - Rob

- ---- Original Message ----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [uuc] Spam-er, marketing e-mail from BMW NA
>
>What got me curious is not so much that, as far as I can dimly
>recall, BMW
>is the ONLY maker currently selling in-line six engines (correct?
>everyone
>else has moved to a Vee configuration, right?), but rather that BMW
>mentions
>that its legendary inline six-cylinder engine is available in 2.5 and
>3.0-liter displacements -- and totally neglects to include the M3's
>3246cc
>motor.  I presume it's because M3s are still selling (relatively)
>well, and
>the 330 and 325 need a bit of promotion?
>
>Just some idle speculation on a slow day....
>
>vty,
>
>--Dennis
>

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:54:36 -0500
From: "Malcolm Reitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [uuc] Fw: E30 Brake Switch

Stan,

I don't have any direct experience with the E30, but the switch on my
E36 acted flakey for a while before it flaked out all together. I'd
replace the switch and be done with it. You don't want to chance getting
rear-ended by some 3-ton SUV that couldn't tell you were stopping.

Malcolm
'88 M5
'98 328i


- -----Original Message-----
From: Stan Jackson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 7:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [uuc] Fw: E30 Brake Switch

I received no reponses, so I'll try this again.  Is it typical for these
things to act up a bit before failing completely?

Stan


- ----- Original Message -----
From: Stan Jackson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:27 AM
Subject: E30 Brake Switch


> I recently had my brake switch act up.  This is the switch located on
the
> brake pedal.  My brake lights quit, so I tried to check that switch.
I
> never got it removed, but just by playing with it the lights started
working
> again.  Should I be changing the switch (imminent failure?) or was it
more
> likely just a bit loose/bad connection?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stan
>
>

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 10:47:48 -0400
From: "Robinson, Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [uuc] Book repair charges - WAS Central Locking Question

Where I come from we call this stealing.  Sorry, if you can do the job in
less than the book hours, you shouldn't charge book hours.  To do so is just
not being a decent person.  If you take longer than book hours, there should
be one of two choices.  Either the job took longer than book hours because
of the condition of the car or something else you found wrong, or you took
longer because you are not proficient enough at the task.  In the first
case, the customer should be charged & in the second, the customer should
not be charged.

The other question would be, "how long did it actually take".  I know a 7
prolly has a more complex locking system, but I replaced the lock cylinders
(including the glovebox, trunk & ignition) & associated hardware (i.e.
removing the door panels) in my E30 in under 2 hours.  It's possbile that
they might have charged him for some complete central locking diagnosis &
replacement when all they did was lube a couple of parts.  Anyway, if I got
bill for more hours than they had the car, I would start to wonder this
stuff.

So, he dropped it off at 8 & picked it up at 4.  8 hours.  Did the mechanic
have lunch?  Some smoke breaks?  What about cleanup?  What about writing the
service & billing tickets.  I would guess the mechanic prolly worked on the
car 2-3 hours at most.

Hopefully your friend remembers this & votes with his wallet next time he
considers a new car.

Lee

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dennis Wynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 6:47 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [uuc] Book repair charges - WAS Central Locking Question
> 
> 
> A guy I know had his 7 series into the local BMW dealer for out of
> warranty repairs. He dropped it off at 8:00am and picked it 
> up at 4:00pm.
> 
> Looking at the bill he was charged for 10 hours or so of 
> labor (I can't
> remember the exact numbers - but it was 2-3 hours more than the time
> the dealer had the car).
> 
> He asked how many mechanics had worked on the car - the 
> answer was one.
> 
> He asked how they could work on it longer that it was in 
> their possession -
> the answer was that he was charged the book rate and this his mechanic
> (lucky for him) was faster than the book time. If it had 
> taken longer, then
> he would have paid the same (they said).
> 
> I would not mind having a good mechanic that can fix my car 
> in less time
> that the books calls for. But it would SEEM tempting to the 
> mechanics to
> rush through all the jobs. Do 12 hours worth of work in 8 
> hours and make
> 50% more money.
> 
> Is this NORMAL for BMW dealers?
> 
> Dennis
> 
> At 11:19 PM 08/18/2003 +0100, Andrew Thomas wrote:
> >Josh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > > I hesitated to bring up the dealer part too, as I didn't 
> want my first
> > > post to stir up problems and/or be whiney.    I was in shock
> > > when I was
> > > quoted $179, and when I pressed him on it, his response 
> was "well, the
> > > tech has to take the wheel off".  :(  He also quoted
> > > something like $485
> > > for replacing the lower control arm bushings.  When I asked
> > > him whether
> > > he was sure those weren't warranty items, he came back and
> > > said yes.  It
> > > sounds like these are fairly commonly replaced items on E46s,
> > > but is it
> > > questionable whether they're warranty or customer pay items?
> >
> >I inferred from Josh's post that this dealer was in the 
> metropolitan area of
> >Atlanta.  Egregious charges are not unfamiliar coming from a 
> dealer in the
> >centre of town whose customer base is perhaps less likely to 
> quibble.  I
> >used to think that there was a BMW standard way of dealing 
> with warranty vs
> >out-of-warranty remedial work but I have found that dealers 
> out of town are
> >more likely to cover something under the warranty - or 
> extend goodwill to
> >the customer - than a dealer in the city.
> >
> >I imagine this is partly to do with the value of warranty 
> work vs. the cost
> >of labour inside and outside of the metropolitan area, and 
> the simple law of
> >supply and demand.
> >
> >Andy T
> 

------------------------------

End of [uucdigest] V3 #6678
***************************

|
| In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
|________________________________________
| Please visit these UUC-approved BMW parts vendors/service providers:
|          (listed alphabetically)
|
| Autoscope-Motorsports - http://www.autoscope-motorsports.com
|
|====================================================
|
| Koala MotorSport . BMW technical information, special tool sales/rental
|      http://www.koalamotorsport.com
|
|====================================================
|
| Taylor BMW - http://www.taylorbmw.com - Doc Bimmer!
|
|====================================================
| Turner Motorsport Inc . The Ultra-High Performance BMW Specialist
| 207 Elm Street, Amesbury, MA 01950
| 978-388-7769 / fax 978-388-4202
| http://www.turnermotorsport.com
|
|====================================================
|
| UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning
| and home of the Ultimate Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
| 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
|__________________________________________________________

Reply via email to