[uucdigest]        Tuesday, September 16 2003        Volume 03 : Number 6757



_________________________________________________________________
|
|  Search the ARCHIVES:
|     http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|  Visit Richard Nott's Ultimate BMW Database:
|     http://www.bmwdatabase.com
|
| For all available Digest commands including unsubscribe/subscribe,
| visit the BMW UUC Digest page: http://www.uucdigest.com
|
| Send SUBMISSIONS to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Complaints?  Send 'em to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you must.
| Technical Problems? Send 'em to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|__________________________________________________________________

In this BMW UUC Digest:

       Re: [uuc] <E36> M3 Tire Size Options
       [uuc] '99 540i/6 e39 parts question
       [uuc] re: On a Journey
       Re: [uuc] Re: Tire Patch Shape  --  in the Snow
       Re: [uuc] anybody got a good sub-$9K 5-series or 7-series in or close to NJ?
       Re: [uuc] anybody got a good sub-$9K 5-series or 7-series in or close to NJ?
       [uuc] OT re: electrolytic rust removal
       RE: [uuc] <OT> Explaining Women (was Re: tire patch shape)
       [uuc] E30 suspension upgrade: from an engine guy

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:27:10 -0400
From: "Gary Derian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [uuc] <E36> M3 Tire Size Options

Softer when very cold, that is.  On the other hand, they will tear up easier
on the track, although Michelin does an excellent job of applying tougher
compounds to the shoulder and softer compounds to the middle.  There is a
reason Michelin tires are sooo expensive.

Gary Derian

> There are new Pilots out there called Pilot Sports A/S (for all seasons)
> that have a softer compound for better winter traction.

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 16:52:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ian Osborn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] '99 540i/6 e39 parts question

Looking for some leads on a wrecked '99 e39 540
6-speed.

I need the ABS computer and pump to replace a failed
computer in my car.  It is located on the right front
shock bulge in the engine compartment.  (they
apparently  moved on various iteration of the ABS/DSC
system)

It needs to be a manual '99 540.

Anybody know of anyone parting out an e39 or a good
BMW parts dealer?

Thanks for any help.

Ian

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 19:00:25 -0500
From: "Steve & Barb Conner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] re: On a Journey

Sorry for the accidental post yesterday.  I must have hit the digest in
the address box when I was trying to email my son.
Barb Conner

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:16:01 -0400
From: "Gary Derian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [uuc] Re: Tire Patch Shape  --  in the Snow

Stan, I agree mostly.

For ice racing with studs, I'd go for the wider tire as you can rip up more
ice.  For 1 inch of snow or semi packed snow where a tire leaves an imprint
of its tread pattern, new all season tires are almost as good as snow tires.
Notice the word new.  Q rated studless ice tires <cough-blizzak-cough> are
scary on dry pavement but are great for driving on an ice rink.

A narrow tire that does not need to push snow away is a major benefit in
deep snow.  For ice and packed snow, wider does fine.  For moderate
conditions, you don't need the best, all season tires do well.  Its only
when the weather is extreme that one needs the best.  If one needs to get
somewhere in the worst of conditions, driving a bit slower in dry conditions
is the price to be paid.  The narrow tire packs the snow harder underneath
it.  Snow is one surface that you do not want floatation.

H rated snow tires in a reasonably wide size are a good compromise for dry
road driving in the winter.

For mud, the tire really does need to get down there past the slop to the
more firm stuff.

Gary Derian


> Ahh, now that is where the rub began, but someone has intercepted me and
> gone right to the punch.  I just wanted to be clear regarding performance
on
> dry pavement first.
>
> In rain, the issue is water evacuation and Gary's answer makes perfect
sense
> to me.
>
> In the winter, we have a different story.  The old standby has been to go
> minus one with winter tires because the narrower tire cuts through the
snow
> better.  It is true that in regular snow or loose gravel/dirt you build up
a
> wedge in front of the tire.  A narrower tire will have a narrower wedge of
> snow or gravel to cut through.  However, the benefit will depend on how
deep
> the snow or gravel is.  You'll see little benefit in an inch of fluffy
snow
> or on a harder gravel surface.  AND, today's modern snow tires have gotten
> so good, that you could be gaining little and perhaps sacrificing
cornering
> ability.  I don't believe there is enough evidence to indicate the extent
of
> each effect.  If you are on ice or hard packed snow, there will be little
or
> no benefit to the narrower tire.
>
> Of course, throughout both the pavement discussion and now the snow
> discussion we are talking about racing.  On the street, you may not often
> reach the limits of tire patch distortion.  In the snow, you may never
reach
> those limits at all -- unless you come Ice Racing with us in NH.  Again,
> I've not done any testing, but I believe it is likely that we reach tire
> patch distortion levels at least some of the time.
>
> What does this all mean?  Think carefully before buying a narrow snow
tire.
> If it is a Q speed-rated tire (typical for a snow tire), you may find an
> exacerbated loss in dry pavement capability and little or no benefit in
> winter driving.  A wider snow tire will give you better dry cornering and
> equivalent winter performance except in deeper snow.  At least that is my
> best current opinion.
>
> BTW, I don't go with the idea of the narrower tire cutting through to the
> solid surface below better.  If that were the case, then the wider tire
> would probably be better.  A wider tire would have a more difficult time
> cutting the snow out of the way, but at any given instant it would have a
> larger area of freshly exposed "solid surface" (infinitesimal length X the
> width of the tire).  The solid surface would have much better traction, so
> having a wider exposed area should be significant.
>
> Stan
>
> P.S.  When braking on snow, locked wheels (which utilize the wedge of snow
> to slow the car) *can* sometimes brake as well or almost as well as ABS
> brakes in snow or loose gravel.  This presumes that the snow does not
smear
> into an icy surface under locked wheels, which is common but does not
always
> occur.  On sheer ice, ABS tends to definitely be an impediment to braking.
> The ABS cycles over and over trying to find traction that it is almost
> nonexistent -- catching most, but missing some.  Locked wheels will catch
> 100% of every bit of traction they hit.
>
>
>
>
> Gary Derian replied:
> > For rain, a narrower tire has to 1) push water a shorter distance, and
2)
> > has less water to push.  For wide tires, the shortest water drain path
is
> > straight through the middle.  For narrow tires, the shortest path is to
> the
> > sides.  Also, large tread blocks need to have a drain from the middle to
> the
> > edge, say a V or U shape.
> >
> > For mud and snow, a narrow tire digs down to to the hard stuff.
>
> ----------------------------
> Before that Scott asked:
> > > Interesting topic. Thank you, Gary.
> > > It's great to learn some of the principles behind what for me was only
> > > intuitive.
> > > And while we're on this, why is it that a long narrow footprint
provides
> > > better traction in snow and rain?
> > > rss

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:50:52 -0700
From: "Kevin Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [uuc] anybody got a good sub-$9K 5-series or 7-series in or close to NJ?

Rob asked:

>Anybody got a good sub-$9K 5-series or 7-series
>in or close to NJ?

Then someone suggested a Jag XJ

The Jag XJ is a nice looking car but will cost about twice as much to own
and operate than a 6cyl BMW 5 Series or about 50% more to own and operate
than a 6 cyl BMW 7 Series.  My cost of ownership estimate is based on based
on personal observations and reports on this list and the two daily Land
Rover lists I'm on (that have a lot of Jag owners).  I didn't include
depreciation in my cost of ownership estimate and as a whole Jags (and most
other British cars) tend to depreciate faster and be harder to sell than
BMWs with high miles.

Than Gary wrote:

>No $9,000 car will impress clients, unless they are idiots.
>If they are, he shouldn't want them as clients.  Hmm...

You might not be impressed when a guy pulls up in clean a high mileage
$80,000 750iL or $66,000 Range Rover 4.6HSE (that are both worth $9K today)
but 99% of the rest of the world will...

Kevin Kelly
BMW CCA 50039

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 23:08:51 -0400
From: "Gary Derian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [uuc] anybody got a good sub-$9K 5-series or 7-series in or close to NJ?

Yeh, my mom drives a 1986 Caddy, probably worth $50 now and she thinks,
"Hey, its a Cadillac".

Gary Derian

>
> Than Gary wrote:
>
> >No $9,000 car will impress clients, unless they are idiots.
> >If they are, he shouldn't want them as clients.  Hmm...
>
> You might not be impressed when a guy pulls up in clean a high mileage
> $80,000 750iL or $66,000 Range Rover 4.6HSE (that are both worth $9K
today)
> but 99% of the rest of the world will...
>
> Kevin Kelly
> BMW CCA 50039
>

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:26:47 -0400
From: "David A. Leonard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] OT re: electrolytic rust removal

Gil Wrote>>My grandfather died a while ago. Our family is just starting to 
go through
the house to recover any worthwhile belongings. He had a fair amount of hand
tools. Most of them have a full compliment of surface rust due to years of
neglect. Is there a way to restore these tools to their former states? Will
they always be rusty? Any insight would be appreciated. TIA
V

http://www.intricatearticles.com/personal/rustfaq.html

I haven't tried it but I have read that it is effective..

Dave Leonard

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 08:40:29 -0400
From: "Robinson, Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [uuc] <OT> Explaining Women (was Re: tire patch shape)

The bridge will probably have a lower cost of upkeep as well......  ;^)

Lee->ducking & running in serpentine fashion

> A guy finds an oddly shaped bottle and, while cleaning it up, 
> out pops the
> obligatory genie.  The genie says he will grant the guy one wish.
> 
> "Now don't grant any wishes yet, I'm just thinking out loud 
> here", the guys
> says.  "I've always wanted to go to Hawaii, but I get seasick 
> on boats, and
> I have a fear of flying.  If I wish to go to Hawaii, I won't 
> be able to get
> back without flying or taking a ship.  So that's not a good 
> wish.  But if
> there were a bridge to Hawaii, I could drive both ways.  OK, 
> then that's my
> wish, I wish for a bridge to Hawaii."
> 
> The genie thinks for a moment to size up the request.  "A bridge would
> require a tremendous amount of engineering.  The supports out in the
> Pacific would have to be a couple of miles deep just to reach 
> the bottom,
> and then anchored deep into the ocean floor.  The structure 
> would require a
> few billion tons of steel, and it would take forever to do all the
> calculations to know how to design it.  Plus there would need 
> to be gas
> stops every couple hundred miles, places to stop to rest or 
> sleep, and all
> kinds of other things.  I'm sorry, that request would be impossible to
> grant, please choose something else."
> 
> "OK then", says the guy, "all I want is to be able to truely 
> understand
> women."
> 
> The genie pauses for a minute, then asks, "You want two lanes on that
> bridge or four?"
> 
> Scott Miller
> GGC BMW CCA
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:10:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Drew Sheppard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [uuc] E30 suspension upgrade: from an engine guy

- --0-550382407-1063728654=:4673
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


The car: 87 325is with 160k miles.  

This info will hopefully help some of the less experienced on the list, I am sure many 
of you have been through the same thing.  After getting input from this crew on 
suspension upgrades I went with the Bilstein Sport Shocks with H&R Sport Springs.   
The plan was simple, get the parts Thursday morning, install Thursday afternoon, get 
alignment Friday at lunchtime, then give it a good shakedown at Infineon/Sears Point 
on Sunday. Great plan�..

UPS delivers late in the day Thursday, have not done anything yet and I am behind.  I 
thought I would get warmed up by doing the back first.  Shocks are easy.  The 
springs�.Bentley says take a few more things off than I wanted to.  So I only raised 
the car some (and used jack stands) then got underneath to pull down (compress) the 
spring down on the trailing arm to get it clear of the part that holds it in place 
from above. This worked pretty well, but you will want to make sure you have 
sufficient clearance for your fingers after you compress it, slide the top over a 
little, then release to wiggle it out. I did on the second one�.

Then the fronts�after you disconnect it from steering, suspension, and brakes you can 
get the strut out. This is where I got stuck (late at night Thursday) The top of the 
insert shaft and the nut are recessed in the top of the strut.  So I got them both off 
and decided to resume in the morning, surely this would be easy and make sense then�..

Thank you to those that emailed. Thank you to Kurt, Bob, and Rob, who called me when I 
was getting in panic mode.  Thank you to Mark who had me swing over to his house and 
offered help. 

A few ways to get this apart. One way is to use small socket and �� drive on the shaft 
INSIDE a deep socket on the nut. Then turn the nut with the deep socket (if it has 
flats use a crescent wrench, if it doesn�t add some) while using the �� drive socket 
to hold the shaft.  Very easy in hindsight.  Or method #2 is to use an impact wrench. 
(I need one clearly)  Others suggested pipe wrenches etc.  So the car went back 
together late Friday morning in record time (all the while reminding myself not to 
screw up�..reconnecting steering/suspension/brakes seemed kind of important) and I got 
the alignment. I also had him spend a few minutes checking my work. 

I immediately could tell the difference. I don�t think it is too stiff for the road, 
and the car dropped about 1.25� all around. It feels much better.

On to the track.  A few observations. (Car now has a chip, better brakes, and now the 
suspension) This is a good car for the track. Neutral, forgiving, quick. I had the 
chance to run for a while with some mixed company, caught some people in faster cars, 
pointed some by. For those of you that know the track, turning in early for 2 and 3A 
is not good. (Up a hill to approach the turn with apex at the top, 90 degree right 
handers) I found myself doing this since I couldn�t see the exit, felt I needed to do 
something.  Bad.  The other big one is not to brake late into 4. (coming downhill, 
feels off camber, about or slightly more than 90 degrees)  I at least stayed on the 
track (not by much�.)  My car was done when a tire failed (defective? lots of tread 
but little silver threads sticking out in one section)  I also had the chance to drive 
an Audi S4/V8/AWD on the track. This was nice. I was immediately slowed by traffic who 
didn�t understand the point by and I was not about lose!
 my track
 privelages by going by without a point.  I also had the chance to drive an Audi 
TT/AWD/Turbo and it was a let down. Kind of heavy�.

That�s it. Thanks again for the input and help.  As I catch up on UUC mail I clearly 
missed an interesting thread, perhaps in the 10 or so posts I have left to read this 
topic was banned.....  (Sound of Drew throwing grenades) 

1. I am slowly learning that cheaper is not the only way to go. I am reaching the 
point in my life where I will often pay more for a part from a known source/place 
where I get service. I still experiment with this (yes, I looked online for the 
cheapest place that sells the exact suspension parts I wanted) However I wonder, is 
the online retailer going to stay open for an additional 10 mins when you call at 4:55 
on Friday and desperately need a part? ("I am sorry sir, you missed our shipping 
deadline since our warehouse is in Botswana, we can overnight it -for $37 more- on 
Monday and you will have it Tuesday ny 10am") Online retailers are great for some 
things (commodities, very specific/obscure, etc). 

2. It is true that as a business I can usually get something for a lower piece cost 
from Asia.  Many people have cited why that is.  What many of the accountants miss is 
the additional engineering time ($), travel ($), management hassles ($), etc ($$$) 
that come with getting that �cheaper� part. 

Drew

 


- ---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
- --0-550382407-1063728654=:4673
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<DIV>
<P class=MsoNormal>The car: 87 325is with 160k miles.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: 
yes">&nbsp; </SPAN></P>
<P class=MsoNormal>This info will hopefully help some of the less experienced on the 
list, I am sure many of you have been through the same thing.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>After getting input from this crew on 
suspension upgrades I went with the Bilstein Sport Shocks with H&amp;R Sport 
Springs.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;&nbsp; </SPAN>The plan was simple, get 
the parts Thursday morning, install Thursday afternoon, get alignment Friday at 
lunchtime, then give it a good shakedown at Infineon/Sears Point on Sunday. Great 
plan�..</P>
<P class=MsoNormal>UPS delivers late in the day Thursday, have not done anything yet 
and I am behind.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>I thought I would get 
warmed up by doing the back first.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Shocks 
are easy.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The springs�.Bentley says take 
a few more things off than I wanted to.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; 
</SPAN>So I only raised the car some (and used jack stands) then got underneath to 
pull down (compress) the spring down on the trailing arm to get it clear of the part 
that holds it in place from above. This worked pretty well, but you will want to make 
sure you have sufficient clearance for your fingers after you compress it, slide the 
top over a little, then release to wiggle it out. I did on the second one�.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal>Then the fronts�after you disconnect it from steering, suspension, 
and brakes you can get the strut out. This is where I got stuck (late at night 
Thursday) The top of the insert shaft and the nut are recessed in the top of the 
strut.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>So I got them both off and decided 
to resume in the morning, surely this would be easy and make sense then�..</P>
<P class=MsoNormal>Thank you to those that emailed. Thank you to Kurt, Bob, and Rob, 
who called me when I was getting in panic mode.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; 
</SPAN>Thank you to Mark who had me swing over to his house and offered help. </P>
<P class=MsoNormal>A few ways to get this apart. One way is to use small socket and �� 
drive on the shaft INSIDE a deep socket on the nut. Then turn the nut with the deep 
socket (if it has flats use a crescent wrench, if it doesn�t add some) while using the 
�� drive socket to hold the shaft.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Very 
easy in hindsight.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Or method #2 is to use 
an impact wrench. (I need one clearly)<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; 
</SPAN>Others suggested pipe wrenches etc.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; 
</SPAN>So the car went back together late Friday morning in record time (all the while 
reminding myself not to screw up�..reconnecting steering/suspension/brakes seemed kind 
of important) and I got the alignment. I also had him spend a few minutes checking my 
work. </P>
<P class=MsoNormal>I immediately could tell the difference. I don�t think it is too 
stiff for the road, and the car dropped about 1.25� all around. It feels much 
better.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal>On to the track.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>A few 
observations. (Car now has a chip, better brakes, and now the suspension) This is a 
good car for the track. Neutral, forgiving, quick. I had the chance to run for a while 
with some mixed company, caught some people in faster cars, pointed some by. For those 
of you that know the track, turning in early for 2 and 3A is not good. (Up a hill to 
approach the turn with apex at the top, 90 degree right handers) I found myself doing 
this since I couldn�t see the exit, felt I needed to do something.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Bad.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; 
</SPAN>The other big one is not to brake late into 4. (coming downhill, feels off 
camber, about or slightly more than 90 degrees)<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; 
</SPAN>I at least stayed on the track (not by much�.)<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: 
yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>My car was done when a tire failed (defective? lots!
 of tread
 but little silver threads sticking out in one section)<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: 
yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>I also had the chance to drive an Audi S4/V8/AWD on the track. This 
was nice. I was immediately slowed by traffic who didn�t understand the point by and I 
was not about lose my track privelages by going by without a point.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>I also had the chance to drive an Audi 
TT/AWD/Turbo and it was a let down. Kind of heavy�.</P>
<P class=MsoNormal>That�s it. Thanks again for the input and help.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>As I catch up on UUC mail I clearly missed an 
interesting thread, perhaps in the 10 or so posts I have left to read this topic was 
banned.....<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>(Sound of Drew throwing 
grenades) </P>
<P class=MsoNormal>1. I am slowly learning that cheaper is not the only way to go. I 
am reaching the point in my life where I will often pay more for a part from a known 
source/place where I get service.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;I still 
experiment with this (yes, I looked online for the cheapest place that sells the exact 
suspension parts I wanted) However I wonder, i</SPAN>s the online retailer going to 
stay open for an additional 10 mins when you call at 4:55 on Friday and desperately 
need a part? ("I am sorry sir, you missed our shipping deadline since our warehouse is 
in Botswana, we can overnight it -for $37 more- on Monday and you will have it Tuesday 
ny 10am") Online retailers are great for some things (commodities,&nbsp;very 
specific/obscure, etc). </P>
<P class=MsoNormal>2. It is true that as a business I can usually get something for a 
lower piece cost from Asia. <SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</SPAN>Many people 
have cited why that is.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>What many of the 
accountants miss is the additional engineering time ($), travel ($), management 
hassles ($), etc ($$$) that come with getting that �cheaper� part. </P>
<P class=MsoNormal>Drew</P></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><p><hr SIZE=1>
Do you Yahoo!?<br>
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=10469/*http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com";>Yahoo! 
SiteBuilder</a> - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
- --0-550382407-1063728654=:4673--

------------------------------

End of [uucdigest] V3 #6757
***************************

|
| In memory of Michel Potheau - friend, enthusiast, founder of the BMW CCA.
|________________________________________
| Please visit these UUC-approved BMW parts vendors/service providers:
|          (listed alphabetically)
|
| Autoscope-Motorsports - http://www.autoscope-motorsports.com
|
|====================================================
|
| Koala MotorSport . BMW technical information, special tool sales/rental
|      http://www.koalamotorsport.com
|
|====================================================
|
| Taylor BMW - http://www.taylorbmw.com - Doc Bimmer!
|
|====================================================
| Turner Motorsport Inc . The Ultra-High Performance BMW Specialist
| 207 Elm Street, Amesbury, MA 01950
| 978-388-7769 / fax 978-388-4202
| http://www.turnermotorsport.com
|
|====================================================
|
| UUC Motorwerks - BMW Performance Fine-tuning
| and home of the Ultimate Short Shifter - accept no substitutes!
| 908-874-9092 . http://www.uucmotorwerks.com
|__________________________________________________________

Reply via email to