On 8-May-08, at 8:14 AM, Nat Sakimura wrote: > Hi Dick, > > In this respect, it comes down to the National Chapter governance > structure, just same as for OIDF itself.
exactly > > If the governance of the National Chapter is done democratically and > openly, then those that are not happy with then current administration > should be able to pursuade other members and correct the situation. potentially :) > > > At the same time, the organization must have the administrative > capability, since otherwise, even if the decision made by the > organization is sound, it cannot be executed. > > So, in essence, we should > 1) just define what is an appropreate governance structure for this > purpose, > 2) define what is an appropreate admnistrative capability > and use these as the certification criteria. > > Actually, the same applies to OIDF itself. > > The content of 1) and 2) above needs more discussion, I think, in > the WG > level just like Mike indicated. I do not think Local Chapters policy > needs to wait for the completion of such. So will the OIDF need to review and approve the governance structure for each national chapter? I understand and agree the problem can be solved -- the local chapter proposal has no process for solving the issue I have raised. What would you suggest we add to the proposal so that the process for approving a national chapter is not arbitrary? -- Dick _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
