Um, the two companies were listed were specifically mentioned in the original motion that I just forwarded to you and you replied.
You already voted -1 to the motion. It was a pretty short email, and was discussed at the last board meeting. Now you are unclear on what you voted -1 to. WTF? Are you smoking crack? ;-) On 23-Oct-08, at 10:39 AM, David Recordon wrote: > Yeah, seems my reading comprehension was off. In anycase, I support > adding two corporate members just not the two specified in the motion > previously. > > Dick, if this motion were to pass, how do you see selecting to two > companies? > > --- > Sent from my iPhone Classic. > > On Oct 23, 2008, at 10:30 AM, "Martin Atkins" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> David Recordon wrote: >>> This motion is about adding two companies, the prior one was about >>> adding one specific company. I support adding two additional >>> companies >>> though as explained on the list not the one specific one in the >>> prior >>> motion. >>> >> >> The motion that I seconded specified two specific corporate board >> members. I think we're thinking of different motions. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> board mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board > > _______________________________________________ > board mailing list > [email protected] > http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board _______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
