On 10/23/2008 08:41 PM, DeWitt Clinton:
And as commentary, I'll add that while I applaud the use of the public board list, and wholeheartedly support its continued use going forward, I find it incredibly unorthodox to unilaterally move an in-progress vote to the public list, particularly one where the motion is partially redacted and requires so much context, especially without any prior discussion with the rest of the board about doing so.The secrecy around this "deal" isn't really conforming for members of OpenID. As a foundation, things should happen in the open or at least include OIDF members. Otherwise it's hard to see the benefit of being a member at all.That said, I'm all for moving future online votes to the public list. Let's just do that up front, rather than doing it unexpectedly midway through.
Regards Signer: Eddy Nigg, StartCom Ltd. <http://www.startcom.org> Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Blog: Join the Revolution! <http://blog.startcom.org> Phone: +1.213.341.0390
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ board mailing list [email protected] http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
