OMFG
The corporate names are in the board-private postings. I just posted
them again. This is the same motion I made at the last board meeting.
Read the rest of my emails about why the corporate names won't be
revealed until the corporations are ready to reveal them.
-- Dick
On 23-Oct-08, at 10:52 AM, DeWitt Clinton wrote:
Dick,
Can we have a restatement of the exact motion on the table, please?
There is clearly some confusion here.
Also, a couple of procedural questions:
1) Why were the corporate names withheld, but not the community
member's?
2) Will the corporate names be revealed at the conclusion of the
vote?
-DeWitt
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Martin Atkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
David Recordon wrote:
> This motion is about adding two companies, the prior one was about
> adding one specific company. I support adding two additional
companies
> though as explained on the list not the one specific one in the
prior
> motion.
>
The motion that I seconded specified two specific corporate board
members. I think we're thinking of different motions.
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
_______________________________________________
board mailing list
[email protected]
http://openid.net/mailman/listinfo/board
