The proposal: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/AutoFlops
is for a) estimating job run times
without requiring projects to supply FLOPS estimates,
and b) normalizing FLOPS-based credit.
It's NOT a proposal for generalizing credit to include factors other than FLOPS.

[email protected] wrote:
> Neither turn around time nor a high success rate is a resource usage.
> 
> Users that fail to meet the deadline take the risk of not getting credit -
> that is the penalty.  If there is a real world deadline, the project should
> generate enough tasks to have a high probability of a quorum being met by
> the real world deadline.  The BOINC deadline for the project should be set
> appropriately.
> 
> If GPU grid needs faster turn around time, they should tighten the deadline
> a bit.  Of course, they may lose some of the clients that way and have
> lower throughput, but it is a tradeoff the project needs to make.
> 
> jm7
> 
> 
>                                                                            
>              "Paul D. Buck"                                                
>              <p.d.b...@comcast                                             
>              .net>                                                      To 
>                                        [email protected]              
>              09/24/2009 01:02                                           cc 
>              PM                        Martin <[email protected]>,      
>                                        BOINC Developers Mailing List       
>                                        <[email protected]>        
>                                                                    Subject 
>                                        Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Card  
>                                        Gflops in BOINC 6.10                
>                                                                            
>                                                                            
>                                                                            
>                                                                            
>                                                                            
>                                                                            
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sep 24, 2009, at 9:22 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>>> From your list, I would remove a few items.
>> Turn Around Time would penalize dialup users and multi project
>> users, and
>> does not affect the final outcome at all.  Of course, if work is
>> returned
>> after the deadline, it counts for 0, so there is a penalty already
>> there.
>> A low Success Rate has its own penalty - no credit for the time
>> spent on
>> the failures.
> 
> Actually it can, and, thus should be available for penalty and
> reward.  The current example is GPU Grid where the turn-around of work
> is important to the project.
> 
> Secondly, it would also matter to your mythical 6 minute turn around
> project ...
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> boinc_dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
> (near bottom of page) enter your email address.

_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Reply via email to