Unless there is some other magic the posted proposal only addresses FP...
It does not mention Integer or double precision FP at all ... I searched on "int" and there are 8 references and none of them are for Integer ... mostly "Maintain" ... :) On Sep 21, 2009, at 12:27 PM, David Anderson wrote: > We already have 2/3 of this (int and FP). > > The current direction is described here (design doc in progress): > http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/wiki/AutoFlops > The idea is to make things as simple as possible for projects, > while still getting accurate job completion estimates and fair credit. > > -- David > > Gabor Gombas wrote: >> How about having multiple benchmarks: one floating-point intensive, >> one >> data intensive etc., and let applications say "I'm 70% floating >> point, >> 10% integer and 20% memory intensive"? You could even have different >> percentages per CPU type. >> Gabor > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
