On Sep 30, 2009, at 12:17 AM, Raistmer wrote:

>>> And everyone that cares about doing science instead of benchmarks   
>>> will opt
>>> out.  Credit is not part of the science being done.
>> And you must have missed the several posts where I have repeatedly   
>> said that each calibration task run is awarded the same amount of   
>> credit as would a "normal" task if not a small but significant  
>> bonus  to encourage opt in ... were the bonus large enough the  
>> cheats would  actually prefer these tasks ...
>
> LoL, now we willing to create work for cheaters ? ;)

Sure, why not, they need love too ...

Besides nothing we have done to this point is catching any ...
_______________________________________________
boinc_dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Reply via email to