On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:03 AM, Raistmer wrote: > >> As to being sorry ... whatever for ... you have a different >> concept ... the only real difference is that yours is more limited >> and >> is not any more likely to be accepted as mine was ... >> > IMO Martin's idea of calibration PCs not "more limited" it's just > more adequate for goals it should serve! He proposed good way to > improve our cross-project credit parity situation, maybe even some > improvement in result validity level and all this w/o additional > overhead on BOINC's hyper-computer of thousands of users's PCs.
well, that is the same place I started ... then it occurred to me that we could kill another bird with the stone ... _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
