There also seems to be some weirdness in that David's October 17 changes to credit.cpp don't appear diffed in any of the messages I received. A search of the my email doesn't show any mentions of credit.cpp since October 2. This could have gotten lost in the conversion, but I mention it just in case it represents a problem.
I'm also a bit concerned given that they are significant changes not mentioned in the checkin_notes messages (apart from the filename appearing there), I'm not entirely sure David meant to be checking them in at this point, or if he was still working on them. On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Eric J Korpela <[email protected]>wrote: > I missed an official message. Are we officially back to git again? For > good this time? > > Eric > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Oliver Bock <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Since BOINC seemingly now made the switch to git, it would be really >> nice if you'd change your commit message style "the git way" as well. >> >> Git uses a subject/body kind of style for its commit messages and almost >> all tools (incl. 3rd party) are designed to respect that. >> >> The format looks like this: >> >> <message_subject_single_line> >> <empty_line> >> <message_body_n_lines> >> >> >> Also, again, please try to make atomic commits. People might want to >> cherry-pick single features to test them in their own branches. That's >> not possible if you mix separate/unrelated changes in the same commit. >> >> >> Thanks, >> Oliver >> _______________________________________________ >> boinc_dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev >> To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and >> (near bottom of page) enter your email address. >> > > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
