Yes, I see the entry on the 16th. I got confused with the entry on the 17th. Something I was thinking of implementing a while back. Thank you David.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Nicolás Alvarez <[email protected] > wrote: > 2012/10/22, Eric J Korpela <[email protected]>: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Eric J Korpela > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > >> I missed an official message. Are we officially back to git again? For > >> good this time? > > There was no official message, as usual. The conversion was also > imperfect and files were manually added later, losing their history. I > haven't yet checked what mess Rom did in d61d9e8. > > > There also seems to be some weirdness in that David's October 17 changes > to > > credit.cpp don't appear diffed in any of the messages I received. A > search > > of the my email doesn't show any mentions of credit.cpp since October 2. > > This could have gotten lost in the conversion, but I mention it just in > > case it represents a problem. > > This is harmless, it's just a problem with the emails. The boinc_cvs > mailing list notifications for commits weren't working until Oct 19. > > > I'm also a bit concerned given that they are significant changes not > > mentioned in the checkin_notes messages (apart from the filename > appearing > > there), I'm not entirely sure David meant to be checking them in at this > > point, or if he was still working on them. > > What changes specifically? If you mean commit 13650183, I do see the > messages for that credit.cpp change in both commit logs and in > checkin_notes (ugh, they are still using that stupid checkin_notes > file?). > > -- > Nicolás > > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
