this is what we use now :) this has one bad effect, we cannot automate with uscan the download of the source tree, but we have to manually call the export script.
What would be nice is to have both possibilities, for people who wants to download the tar.gz or people who want to archive the source tree directly Gianfranco >________________________________ > Da: Oliver Bock <[email protected]> >A: Gianfranco Costamagna <[email protected]> >Cc: Rom Walton <[email protected]>; BOINC Developers Mailing List ><[email protected]>; Boinc <[email protected]> >Inviato: Giovedì 7 Marzo 2013 10:03 >Oggetto: Re: [boinc_dev] [boinc_alpha] Boinc switch proposal > >On 3/7/13 9:55 , Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: >> I know this thanks, but anyway since I have the source tree locally on >> my machine I prefer to use git archive... :) > >Even better. > >> I want just automate the boinc export for debian new release packaging, >> and having a name without the tag id is better :) > >Then why don't you just use git archive instead of, say, wget in your >export script? Use create the archive instead of downloading it again... > > >Oliver > > > _______________________________________________ boinc_dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
