Google Code only allows the 5-7 major open source licenses.
On Oct 7, 9:54 pm, Kevin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Don't know who owns the server used by Boltwire... just a stab in the dark
> but it is most likely Bluehost? Some IPP's have setups for doing this as
> well using your own domain for control.
>
> A new player is Google Code... Just saw a popular package I have used in
> the past that switched from SourceForge to Google Code.
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Markus <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Ignored your hosting question. Bazaar could be hosted for example on
> > SourceForge or Launchpad.
>
> > SourceForge links tohttp://www.opensource.org/docs/osdwhere the
> > following is stated: "The license must not restrict anyone from making
> > use of the program in a specific field of endeavor."
>
> > Launchpad says: "It must not discriminate against persons, groups or
> > against fields of endeavour."
>
> > BoltWire does this. So from the point of view of the Open Source
> > Initiative (and others) BoltWire is not open source.
>
> > There are only two possibilities when it comes to 3rd party hosting:
> > forget it or use an open source license.
>
> > Of course, private hosting is always possible but less
> > straightforward.
>
> > Regards, Markus
>
> > On Oct 7, 9:29 pm, Markus <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I think branching was mentioned because you thought about creating a
> > > stable and a development version (which I think is an important idea).
> > > Consider having a stable version and a development version in two
> > > branches. Then you can make lots of fixes to the dev version without
> > > affecting the stable version. On the other hand you can still easily
> > > fix small errors that don't break things in the stable version. Let it
> > > be a typo or some easy-to-fix bug.
>
> > > This can be done without a revision control system, but it's probably
> > > handier using one.
>
> > > Though the real advantages I see are much easier testing of
> > > development versions and a better record about what has been done when
> > > and how – including code history.
>
> > > Regards, Markus
>
> > > On Oct 7, 12:58 pm, The Editor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > Actually, I'm not too keen on having divergent versions of BoltWire. I
> > > > don't mind individual customizations, but don't want to try and
> > > > maintain or support different strains. So I'd be more inclined to use
> > > > a desktop version if it would help me. I will take a look at Bazaar
> > > > though, and possibly set something up for experimentation.
>
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Dan
>
> > > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Markus <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > Maybe we should stop with the theory and just setup a revision
> > control
> > > > > system. Of course, Dan will stick with his way of development and
> > > > > releasing. In parallel, Dan and all others good tinker with the new
> > > > > system and then decide if it is an improvement or not.
>
> > > > > I am quite busy currently but that will probably change in some
> > weeks.
> > > > > So if anyone wants to set it up...
>
> > > > > Which one should we give a try? Subversion, Bazaar, Git? Personally I
> > > > > like Bazaar because it seemed very intuitive and easy to me when I
> > > > > used it.
>
> > > > > Regards, Markus
>
> > > > > On Oct 6, 6:54 pm, DrunkenMonk <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > >> > Do you recommend any for windows? And does it allow you to easily
> > zip
> > > > >> > up a version when you feel good about it.
>
> > > > >> The export (or similar) command lets you extract a certain version
> > (by
> > > > >> version or date). I think you can do the following with subversion
> > and
> > > > >> the zip command (normally I would use tar for my own projects, not
> > > > >> zip, sp I'm not sure how helpful zip is)
>
> > > > >> svn export <repository>/boltwire | zip <name>.zip
>
> > > > >> otherwise you'd have to do:
>
> > > > >> cd tmp
> > > > >> svn export <repo>/boltwire
> > > > >> zip boltwire boltwire.zip
> > > > >> rm boltwire
>
> > > > >> > The thing that attracts me
> > > > >> > most is sometimes I go up a dead end trail and have to retrace my
> > > > >> > steps before trying something else. Not always 100% successful,
> > but my
> > > > >> > software does have very good undo capabilities!
>
> > > > >> While I've never had the excuse to use it, I like the branching
> > > > >> capabilites, where you can copy parts of the project into a branch,
> > > > >> deveolpe the branch seperate from other branches that may create
> > other
> > > > >> bugs, and then patch in the branches into the main trunk when done.
>
> > > > >> But the "sod this, give me what I hd yesterday at noon"
> > functionality
> > > > >> is definitly the most used of subversions magic on my computers :p
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"BoltWire" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
