Dan, > work on the character encoding issue during the current 3.3 series and > try to get rid of escaping any page content completely. That is likely > to take a few rounds of releases to remove all the bugs. But I'm sure > it will be worth it. I'm also considering the pro's and con's of > ending each page name with .txt. It adds some security and other > advantages, but I don't like it personally as it will slightly > complicate the code. Any opinions on this question?
I would really like if you did get rid of escaping any page content and just store it as entered. I don't have any opinion on .txt; any extension you choose would be fine and I can set windows to open that extension in my text editor. I guess I would prefer an extension of some type just becuase I am used to using them.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en.
