On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 07:56:52PM -0800, jacmgr wrote: > . I don't have any opinion on .txt; any > extension you choose would be fine and I can set windows to open that > extension in my text editor. I guess I would prefer an extension of > some type just becuase I am used to using them.
I am strongly opposed to a spurious extension. But if users on the dark side need a file extension, surely it would be trivial to make it a configuration item? In any case, from what I have seen, modern doze installations hide the extensions by default, and that behaviour could also be copied. But I still think it would be wrong to impose an extension. richard > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "BoltWire" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "BoltWire" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/boltwire?hl=en.
