I assume you replied to me by mistake, Daniel, so I'm sending this to bongo-devel now.
Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Jensen) writes: > >> Now that you mention it, perhaps Bongo should have a `M-&' command as >> well. For example, `% m something RET M-& r' seems reasonable. We >> could steal the implementation from Gnus. > > I'm not entirely opposed to the idea, but maybe `r' should > follow the same "process/prefix convention" as `k', `c', et al.? I guess it could, but then I also think I'd want to use `r' on a single line even when there are marked tracks around. The nice thing about `M-&' is that users can use it for things that we never thought of. Every Bongo command will have support for marks, in a way. >> Interesting. Undo for marks never crossed my mind. Frankly, it strikes >> me as a bit overkill. Maybe I'd use it for undoing `U', but that's all >> I can think of. Or maybe I need a little persuasion? > > The main reason I consider it important is that undoing a > killing of all marked tracks should be possible and DTRT. The tracks will be remarked when you undo a kill? That's sensible. > By the way, would you be opposed to moving `U' somewhere > else and putting `bongo-unmark-backward' on `U' instead? > For example, Ibuffer has the "unmark all" command on `* *'. I kind of like `U'. It gets my vote. _______________________________________________ bongo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bongo-devel
