[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13400531#comment-13400531
]
Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-272:
-------------------------------------
bq.I think that whether the auditor runs or not should be configurable. Is that
a problem?
Hi Flavio, Following are the options to make thie feature configurable:
# Initially I was thinking to provide new configuration item
'enableAutoRecovery=true' in the bk_server.conf file. By default this feature
will be disabled.
# But after seeing the comments in BOOKKEEPER-304. Whether to consider as
plugin process?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-304?focusedCommentId=13398408&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13398408
For this, we need to expose a ServicePlugin interface and will be configured in
the bk_server.conf for enabling the feature.
I'm just confused to take which one is more feasible?
> Provide automatic mechanism to know bookie failures
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-272
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-272
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-server
> Reporter: Rakesh R
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-272.1.patch, BOOKKEEPER-272.2.patch,
> BOOKKEEPER-272.Auditor.1.patch, BOOKKEEPER-272.Auditor.patch
>
>
> The idea is to build automatic mechanism to find out the bookie failures.
> Setup the bookie failure notifications to start the re-replication process.
> There are multiple approaches to findout bookie failures. Please refer the
> documents attached in BookKeeper-237.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
