[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13439427#comment-13439427
 ] 

Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-272:
-------------------------------------

Hi Ivan, Hope I'm not confusing you:-)

As per the discussion/comments, now AutoRecoveryManager will have dependency 
with RW(that is still under dev stage) and also will make use of guava service 
for cleaner. Shall I move the ARM initialization phase to BOOKKEEPER-319 and 
will work there?

So that will make this JIRA completely independent and will discuss only the 
auditing job. Are you agreeing with me?

Also I will get some more time to familiarize with the guava service.
                
> Provide automatic mechanism to know bookie failures
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BOOKKEEPER-272
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-272
>             Project: Bookkeeper
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: bookkeeper-server
>            Reporter: Rakesh R
>            Assignee: Rakesh R
>             Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>         Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-272.1.patch, BOOKKEEPER-272.2.patch, 
> BOOKKEEPER-272.3.patch, BOOKKEEPER-272.Auditor.1.patch, 
> BOOKKEEPER-272.Auditor.patch
>
>
> The idea is to build automatic mechanism to find out the bookie failures. 
> Setup the bookie failure notifications to start the re-replication process.
> There are multiple approaches to findout bookie failures. Please refer the 
> documents attached in BookKeeper-237.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to