[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13440202#comment-13440202
]
Rakesh R commented on BOOKKEEPER-272:
-------------------------------------
Oh! yeah, there was a small mistake in my previous comment with BK1. Please
read the scenario as:
L0001 contains only BK1. while marking missingReplica of BK2, got NEE. Assume
only single auditor and no other is marking. So again we need to merge to the
zkMetadata and update in zk.
> Provide automatic mechanism to know bookie failures
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-272
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-272
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: bookkeeper-auto-recovery
> Reporter: Rakesh R
> Assignee: Rakesh R
> Fix For: 4.2.0
>
> Attachments: BOOKKEEPER-272.1.patch, BOOKKEEPER-272.2.patch,
> BOOKKEEPER-272.3.patch, BOOKKEEPER-272.Auditor.1.patch,
> BOOKKEEPER-272.Auditor.patch
>
>
> The idea is to build automatic mechanism to find out the bookie failures.
> Setup the bookie failure notifications to start the re-replication process.
> There are multiple approaches to findout bookie failures. Please refer the
> documents attached in BookKeeper-237.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
