[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13453885#comment-13453885
]
Uma Maheswara Rao G commented on BOOKKEEPER-315:
------------------------------------------------
I got your concern, Even though we are replicating fragment by fragment, ledger
may have single fragment and can contain with many millions of entries. Let me
take a look for ensuring at least for autoreplication part, as that is
important to it.
> Ledger entries should be replicated sequentially instead of parallel.
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BOOKKEEPER-315
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-315
> Project: Bookkeeper
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: bookkeeper-auto-recovery, bookkeeper-client
> Affects Versions: 4.2.0
> Reporter: Uma Maheswara Rao G
> Assignee: Uma Maheswara Rao G
>
> Currently BookKeeperAdmin will copy the entries parallel.
> This may create more load on the servers. To avoid that, we can refactor the
> BKAdmin code to copy the entries sequential.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
