There is an issue with the release documentation. I'd appreciate some timely input so we can do the right thing for the upcoming release. The problem is one of consistency. The new look-and-feel is only being used by the Boostbook-generated docs. The other docs have a mish-mash of styles.
For example, compare the following 2 sets of docs: http://tinyurl.com/6ftz6 http://tinyurl.com/3nnz7
The biggest difference is the choice of font. We agreed on boost-docs to go with sans-serif for the new look-and-feel. However, it looks a bit odd next to the old-style docs that use a serif font.
The question is what to do now. Here are some options:
1) Revert the new CSS entirely for this release. Encourage people to port their docs to Boostbook for the next release, and check in the new CSS then.
2) Revert just the font to serif. Revisit the font issue for the next release.
3) Do nothing. Live with the inconsistency.
4) Something else?
Please respond with your vote ASAP.
Thanks, Eric
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
