On Tuesday 02 November 2004 05:03, Eric Niebler wrote: > There is an issue with the release documentation. I'd appreciate some > timely input so we can do the right thing for the upcoming release. The > problem is one of consistency. The new look-and-feel is only being used > by the Boostbook-generated docs. The other docs have a mish-mash of styles. > > For example, compare the following 2 sets of docs: > http://tinyurl.com/6ftz6 > http://tinyurl.com/3nnz7 > > The biggest difference is the choice of font. We agreed on boost-docs to > go with sans-serif for the new look-and-feel. However, it looks a bit > odd next to the old-style docs that use a serif font.
I see sans-serif in both links you gave. > The question is what to do now. Here are some options: > > 1) Revert the new CSS entirely for this release. Encourage people to > port their docs to Boostbook for the next release, and check in the new > CSS then. -1. New CSS is better and I want my library to use it. And I think "encouraging" can take undefined time. > 2) Revert just the font to serif. Revisit the font issue for the next > release. > > 3) Do nothing. Live with the inconsistency. That's what I prefer. - Volodya ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
