Eric Niebler wrote:
Joel wrote:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
David Abrahams writes:
"Eric Niebler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
3) Do nothing. Live with the inconsistency.
That one. There's always been some inconsistency in the Boost docs; this is nothing new and we can solve it for the next release.
FWIW, IMO the *degree* of it is new and somewhat disturbing. I'd prefer to see it fixed, since it's only a single CSS tweak.
I would prefer to go that route. It will be hairy, I know. I'm afraid that a "bicycle shed" debate will ensue and will last a long time, but let it be settled once and for all.
By "that route" do you mean "do nothing" or "CSS tweak" ?
3) Do nothing. Live with the inconsistency.
Plus: Start encouraging people to port their docs to Boostbook or at least use the new L&F CSS now. Check in the new CSS now.
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
