"Joel de Guzman" wrote > It's unlike, say, wikipedia, for example, where there is a common > L&F. The reason is because wikipedia, from its inception, used > its content management tool (wiki) which has its own L&F. > Anyone contributing to it implies acceptance of the L&F. > IMO, BoostBook and QuickBook is our ticket to that.
Yikes! I seriously didnt know that!... I hadnt realised quite what I was buying into when I started using QuickBook. It sounds like convenience is bought at quite a high price. I had assumed that it was possible to modify the QuickBook L & F for purposes outside boost else its kind of a one job tool and makes me wary of investing too much in it. Some responses on this list also gave me the impression that it (is/will be) possible to use Quickbook other than for its use for writing boost documentation. Are you saying that I as the author have no control of L & F when using QuickBook? regards Andy Little ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
