Joel de Guzman wrote:
Hi again,

In case some of you might have missed this, I did some minor
CSS tweaks to the quickbook L&F a few days ago. The tweaks
were intended to make the quickbook L&F closer to Rene's
look&feel. If there are no objections, I'd like to commit this
to CVS. So far, Eric Niebler mentions that he likes it, so, that
makes it two of us. I'd like to get a general consensus please.

You can check it out here:

  http://snipurl.com/no8s

Summary:
1) Smaller fonts sizes
2) Ragged right
3) Better code blocks appearance (subtle look)

This is an evolutionary tweak I hope we'll agree on. Comments please.
For comparison, you can check out the current quickbook docs at:

  http://snipurl.com/no93

I'm hoping these tweaks are acceptable. Again, awaiting comments...

In general, I think this is an improvement over the existing CSS, but I have three points:

1) tt.computeroutput is hard-coded as 9pt. In Doxygen-generated reference docs, tt.computeroutput is often used in <h3>, where the 9pt font looks ridiculously small. See "basic_regex construct/copy/destruct" at http://tinyurl.com/fv2d7.

2) Program listings and blurbs have faint grey outlines. TOCs and tables do not. Looks funny. Either use them consistently or don't use them at all.

3) The grey background of the program listings is lighter than that used for TOCs and tables. Any reason not to make that consistent, too?

--
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: 
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs

Reply via email to