Joel de Guzman wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
2) Program listings and blurbs have faint grey outlines. TOCs and
tables do not. Looks funny. Either use them consistently or don't use
them at all.
3) The grey background of the program listings is lighter than that
used for TOCs and tables. Any reason not to make that consistent, too?
How's this: http://tinyurl.com/zb2t8 (tables)
and this: http://tinyurl.com/g44mm (TOCs)
The tables look interestingly like wikipedia's which I like :)
I don't see any difference from before. What did you change? It still
looks inconsistent in the same ways.
--
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
