Rene Rivera wrote:
Eric Niebler wrote:
Looks good, I mostly like the style of the tables matching the style of
all the other box like elements. One aspect I don't like, on which I've
commented on before, is the background shading of body elements. I
prefer to not have a shading, or have minimal shading, as such shadings
interrupt the overall reading structure of the text. Previously I had
made only the tables on my version of the docs shaded following the
BoostBook precedent but now that I look at your rendition I have what I
think is a more pleasing style <http://tinyurl.com/l95fz> where only the
headers in tables are shaded. The example is of the DateTime docs which
makes heavy use of tables.
Ok, shadings removed. IMO, it looks better alright. All shadings are
removed except for table headings.
Seems like we're reaching a convergence and a consensus now. I can't
wait much longer without doing a commit to CVS. It's sitting for
a week now in my HD. So, I just did. As for the remaining contentions,
I'm sure we'll iron those out.
Here's the latest: http://tinyurl.com/z8zk4
Regards,
--
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boost-consulting.com
http://spirit.sf.net
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
