David Abrahams wrote:
"Eric Niebler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
IMO, class references are hard to read because there is no clear
separation between the documentation for different member
functions.
The standard indents the function signature, which helps.
Funny, that's always bugged me. When you /indent/ something, it becomes
less noticeable, IMO.
As an experiment, I've divided member functions with a
subtle horizontal rule.
Before:
http://tinyurl.com/jkxol
After:
http://tinyurl.com/j78g2
Nicer, but why do we have numbers in the first place? Are those like
paragraph numbers in the standard?
They do seem rather useless, don't they? Shall I remove them?
--
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
