Joel de Guzman wrote:
David Abrahams wrote:
"Eric Niebler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As an experiment, I've divided member functions with a
subtle horizontal rule.
Before:
http://tinyurl.com/jkxol
After:
http://tinyurl.com/j78g2
Nicer, but why do we have numbers in the first place? Are those like
paragraph numbers in the standard?
To be honest, I prefer the one without the horizontal rule.
IMO, the number and indentation of the items themselves
already clearly separate each member.
I'm with Joel on this one. Even though I tend to prefer whitespace, I
think the whitespace in the tables is confusing the grouping of the
individual items.
I really need to take a few minutes to fix the 2-pixel problem Eric and
Dave mentioned. And perhaps do a few more experiments with the function
def layout. Since there's a release branch now could one of you check in
some changes so we don't loose the changes. And so we can work from a
single base. Or should we make another branch for this?
--
-- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com
-- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com
-- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
