David Abrahams wrote: > IMO we want a common intermediate representation and a number of > pluggable backend writers, e.g. XHTML, LaTeX, etc. I'm not religious > about how those things are partitioned, though. The backends don't > have to be a separate translation phase, and the intermediate > representation doesn't have to be XML -- it could be an in-memory AST.
I agree. I think that's the right way to go. Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
