"John Maddock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joel de Guzman wrote: >> David Abrahams wrote: >> >>> IMO we want a common intermediate representation and a number of >>> pluggable backend writers, e.g. XHTML, LaTeX, etc. I'm not religious >>> about how those things are partitioned, though. The backends don't >>> have to be a separate translation phase, and the intermediate >>> representation doesn't have to be XML -- it could be an in-memory >>> AST. >> >> I agree. I think that's the right way to go. > > Um, just so you all know, I currently have a not insignificant amount of > Docbook XML escapes in my quickbook docs.
That can be parsed and inserted into the AST, although I agree that makes things a little harder. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
