| -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf | Of John Maddock | Sent: 16 November 2006 09:38 | To: Boost documentation format, structure, and processing discussion | Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Quickbook compilation times? | | Joel de Guzman wrote: | > David Abrahams wrote: | > | >> IMO we want a common intermediate representation and a number of | >> pluggable backend writers, e.g. XHTML, LaTeX, etc. I'm | not religious | >> about how those things are partitioned, though. The | backends don't | >> have to be a separate translation phase, and the intermediate | >> representation doesn't have to be XML -- it could be an in-memory | >> AST. | > | > I agree. I think that's the right way to go. | | Um, just so you all know, I currently have a not | insignificant amount of Docbook XML escapes in my quickbook docs.
I think that is a Very British (understated) "Um" ;-) Paul --- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
