| -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf | Of Joel de Guzman | Sent: 28 November 2006 11:17 | To: [email protected] | Subject: Re: [Boost-docs] Invisible comments? | | Paul A Bristow wrote: | > I can't see why Quickbook comments are wanted in the XML. | > | | We need it in order to do some more post processing of the XML. | At least that's how I understand Dave's need for it.
I can see that but wouldn't an explicit mechanism, say [xml ...] be clearer and better, and not clutter the xml with comments. It would be helpful to have the licence info replicated of course and the licence as comment mechanism does now does that - or does it? Or is there something more complicated here? (Aside - embedding MathML would be jolly helpful). Paul --- Paul A Bristow Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal, Cumbria UK LA8 8AB +44 1539561830 & SMS, Mobile +44 7714 330204 & SMS [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Boost-docs mailing list [email protected] Unsubscribe and other administrative requests: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
