Joel de Guzman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> end up with *two* possibly different license statements, and extra and
>> likely infringing copyright statement.
>
> Also, now that I think about it some more, there's no harm
> in writing:
>
> '''<!-- some doc-book comment here -->'''
>
> if you need some comments to pass through.
I wouldn't want to have to do that for testing instructions. If you
had to do that, nobody would use it. Frankly, I'd rather enter
explicit XML:
'''<literate code="compile()" />'''
but that's nasty too.
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Boost-docs mailing list
[email protected]
Unsubscribe and other administrative requests:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/boost-docs
