"Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2. Why are we reinventing the wheel? What's wrong with
>> boost::throw_exception() from boost/throw_exception.hpp?
>>
> Nothing :-)
> I like this approach... and I had forgot about it.
> Anyway, I was just pointing out that IIF a boost exception class was defined
> it should throw itself.
Why should it? That seems to imply that there /is/ something wrong
with the boost::throw_exception approach.
--
David Abrahams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution
_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
