"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
01d801c29268$c6496cb0$1d00a8c0@pdimov2">news:01d801c29268$c6496cb0$1d00a8c0@pdimov2...
> From: "David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >[...]
> > Well, as you were saying, that it return a unique documented value for
> > each exception type.  Or did I not understand you correctly?
>
> You said: "(rather than changing the requirements for what())". What are
the
> requirements for what() that I, supposedly, want changed?

Ah...I see.  It is that you want to increase the requirements for what,
since
there really are no requirements presently.  By "change", I meant "increase"
(which is a change, no?).

Dave





_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

Reply via email to