From: "David B. Held" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Peter Dimov wrote: > > > My answer is that specifying the precise semantics of what() for every > > documented exception type is a necessary prerequisite. (Implies that > > the standard needs to be fixed, too.) > > Would it be worthwhile to define a different member function (possibly > in a std::exception-derived boost_exception) that returns the precisely > specified key that you desire (rather than changing the requirements for > what())?
What _are_ the requirements for what()? _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
