> >That reminds me of something I was thinking about your post on >wxWindows. Someone could always write a 'driver' targeting wxWindows if >they want quick access to all of the platforms it supports and don't >mind the LGPL. > >Brock >
Not _exactly_ LGPL. To quote from the wxWindows (2.4.0) distribution: " The core distribution of the wxWindows library contains files under two different licences: - Most files are distributed under the GNU Library General Public Licence, version 2, with the special exception that you may create and distribute object code versions built from the source code or modified versions of it (even if these modified versions include code under a different licence), and distribute such binaries under your own terms. - Most core wxWindows manuals are made available under the "wxWindows Free Documentation Licence", which allows you to distribute modified versions of the manuals, such as versions documenting any modifications made by you in your version of the library. However, you may not restrict any third party from reincorporating your changes into the original manuals. " -- Alec Ross _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
