"Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > David B. Held wrote: > [...] > > To bring a bit of sobering reality to the project, I would suggest > > picking a simple, even trivial target project (like displaying some > > trivial dialog box). > > This is exactly what I wanted first: a project based on portable > rectangles, windows, stylish frames, menus, fonts & events. > Thanks for confirming. > [...]
I am of the opinion that the library should use native widgets. It sounds to me like you want to create a custom universal widget set, but of course, this is going to be a hot-button issue for this library. I think the majority of people who have chimed in have also voted for or assumed native widgets, but I could be wrong. An interesting question is whether the library could support a native widget set as an abstract third-party platform. Then people who want that exact portable look and feel can get it by specifying the custom widget platform. Dave _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
