On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 11:40 AM, David Rusling <david.rusl...@linaro.org> wrote: > All, > I'm writing a blog on Linaro's reorganisation (sounds fascinating doesn't > it?). I'm more talking about directions than teams etc, it's not a list of > groups / SIGs etc. One area I'd like to highlight is the importance of EBBR > to LEDGE (aka Fog and Networking). Some thoughts / questions: > > [1] do others believe that EBBR is key to Fog / Edge? I'm less convinced > that Device land will see the push (their is a symbiotic link between > gateways and devices, with gateways being the 'point of security' for their > 'slave' devices).
I think it's likely useful to fog/edge but not critical, it will depend a lot on the size of the device. In the arm space it'll be either EBBR or SBBR/SBSA, either way standardisation will be good. > [2] EBBR et al is complex, so moving down the reference platform route makes > sense (to me at least). I know that reference platforms created a lot of > debate in Linaro in LEG, but I think that has settled down now, with > everyone understanding what they are and are not and where the value is. > > [3] I presume the best way to reference EBBR is via the git repository. Any > other information I should reference (email lists etc)? Yes, I would reference the githib pages [1], we should add things like details of the mailing list into the README/wiki there so there's one spot to reference for everything. [1] https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
