On Sat, Apr 06, 2019 at 07:42:46PM +0000, Grant Likely wrote: > Hi Udit, > > We talked about testing. We generally agreed that UEFI-SCT is important, > even though it is limited. LuvOS (which includes UEFI-SCT) is a good > candidate to do more complete testing, and we also talked about getting > UEFI test cases into the U-Boot CI testing.
Just FYI, it was last July that I ran UEFI SCT with U-Boot on qemu. Here is a summary of the result: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17e45yojM2nLdRovx0gcgHIAmvv9b_yc9iIUjZ2LY22c/edit?usp=sharing (Please note that this is not for public review, but just informative.) In my experience, I saw lots of failure cases (some or most of them are trivial and can be duplicated ones though), and running through all the test cases took a whole week. This is partly because SCT crashes occasionally and I needed to restart it next morning :) So I'm not sure that U-Boot UEFI is ready for automated testing with SCT. (We made lots of improvements recently, but I have had no time to re-run SCT these days. Give me a fast machine :) -Takahiro Akashi > Linaro LEDGE is looking at adding U-Boot testing to their backlog, but > they don't have any engineering resources who can be assigned to the > work right now. I'm also going to try and resource this from Arm. > > g. > > On 04/04/2019 16:08, Udit Kumar wrote: > > Hi Grant > > > >>>- other business > > > > See, if you can add compliance test suits for EBBR, or subset of > > UEFI-SCT is enough ? > > > > Regards > > > > Udit > > > > *From:* [email protected] > > <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Grant Likely > > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 12:49 PM > > *To:* Dong Wei <[email protected]>; Eric FINCO <[email protected]>; > > Robert Oshana <[email protected]>; Tony Wu <[email protected]>; > > [email protected]; arm.ebbr-discuss > > <[email protected]>; LEDGE SC <[email protected]>; Varis, Pekka > > <[email protected]> > > *Subject:* Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect > > > > Agenda for today: > > > > - EBBR v1.0 released (yay!) > > > > - goals for v1.1 or v2.0 > > > > - other issues > > > > - secure world interfaces > > > > - non-block storage > > > > - identification of protected blocks > > > > - other business > > > > --- > > > > Grant Likely > > > > Sr. Technical Director SW Engineering > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > *From:*Grant Likely > > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 3, 2019 1:49:23 PM > > *To:* Dong Wei; Eric FINCO; [email protected]; Tony Wu; > > [email protected]; arm.ebbr-discuss; LEDGE SC; Varis, Pekka > > *Subject:* Re: EBBR SC meeting on-site at Connect > > > > details for those who had trouble with the calendar invite: > > > > Room: Lotus 5-6 > > > > Time: 5:00pm > > > > Sorry for those of you who aren’t here. I’m not going to have a dial in, > > but I’ll take good notes. > > > > g. > > > > _______________________________________________ > boot-architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture _______________________________________________ boot-architecture mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/boot-architecture
